
The attack on Hill 60 has been described as hastily
conceived, poorly arranged, and undertaken with
raw troops not up to dealing with what confronted
them. The newly arrived 18th suffered severely. Half
of them were made casualties, and half of these casualties,
Wilfred Addison among them, were killed. Their sacrifice
achieved little, if anything, in military terms. Charles
Bean's description of Wilfred's death says nothing
about the overall failure of the attack, his only
criticism of its conduct being the lack of support
which led to an Australian position having to be abandoned.
His chief concern was to ensure that the family saw
Wilfred's death as one that would reflect well on
his memory:
 |

He went into action next morning at daylight
and was killed, his company "D" being chopped
to bits and half his battalion lost. Yesterday,
I went to the position and saw McDonald, A
J, an old client of mine and Wilfred's Major.
I also went over the ground fought over. There
is a gully opening on to level ground for
about 200 yards to the foot hills of a big
mountain, the troops had to run across the
open to seize the Turk's trenches and occupy
them; this was done but owing to lack of support
had to give up one line and only hold the
first one which we do now and are snugly entrenched
in. McDonald told me that on the order to
advance WA led his Platoon 13 across the open
and then jumped out of the first trench with
his revolver drawn called out "Come on boys
the next one" and backed up by his company
who so far had lost only 3, ran across the
next intervening space, but he had only gone
a few yards when machine gunfire got him,
the trench was taken, but, as I say, had to
be given up and a retreat made to the first
line. Both McDonald and the Colonel A E Chapman
(of WR Beaver's Office) told me that Wilfred
acted with the greatest bravery and if he
had lived would have been mentioned in despatches
– he certainly brought credit to us
and must always be remembered as a highly
courageous man. Tell Glent and Ettie [Wilfred's
parents] how sorry I am and I shall write
them when I get more particulars. Percy is
well his battalion having been in reserve.
|
 |
 |

['Hill 60', Chris Coulthard-Clark, Where
Australians Fought, Sydney, 1998, p.110]
|
 |

In 1916 Wilfred's mother, Harriet Addison, who founded
the 18th Battalion's Comfort Fund in Sydney, tried
to get for her son a posthumous promotion to the rank
of Captain. She was motivated in this by the family's
strong military tradition dating back to a Captain
Addison who had fought in 1775 against the American
insurgents at the Battle of Bunker Hill. Brigadier
General William Holmes, who had commanded the 18th
at Hill 60, wrote to her from France to say that this
request was impossible to grant. Whatever he knew
about the reality of the sad attack on Hill 60, Holmes
placed Wilfred's death firmly in the context of bravery
and sacrifice:

Another account of Wilfred's death came from a Sergeant
Roberts, clearly a member of the 18th Battalion, who
survived Hill 60. Roberts sent a much more
mixed message to the family. He is the only correspondent
to indicate that the Hill 60 situation was a disaster
and that those directing the war were, perhaps, throwing
away the lives of ordinary soldiers. But Roberts,
in the knowledge perhaps that he is addressing Wilfred's
mother, nevertheless reinforces the sentiment, conveyed
by others, that Wilfred Addison did not die in vain:
 |

And as died another of Australia's heroes,
because someone blundered, we, the pawns in
this great game of war, must pay the price…
What ever memories you cherish of your son
add this one to them... He died nobly in action
leading his men to victory for we took the
trenches, though he was not there in life
to see us, already passed from this world
into the next.
|
 |
 |

[Letter, Sergeant Roberts, Estaples, France,
undated to Mrs H Addison, Sydney: AWM 1DRL,
9, 12/I 1/45]
|
 |
|